[DVIPDFMx] [ulrich.seidl at gmail.com: [tex-live] dvipdfmx on solaris9]

[Matthias Franz]

Hi Karl,

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:21:51PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> Wdyt?
> Looking at the definitions of %l and %hh, I don't see that they are the
> same, although perhaps they give the same result.

Why are you talking about "%l"? The suggestion was to use "%c".
I have no objection against "%c".

> I currently have a problem when running dvipdfmx from texlive-2009 on a
> solaris 9 machine. I tracked it down to
> the call of fscanf(file, "%%PDF-1.%hhu", &minor) in the function
> check_for_pdf_version. Though this works on solaris10, it does not work
> on solaris9 since the "%hhu" format specifier is not defined there. May
> I suggest changing the format specifier to "%c"?
-- 
Matthias